Tanya Mittal’s “no ego” remark sparks disagreement with Kunickaa Sadanand in Bigg Boss 19.
Amid ongoing accusations of bias, unfair evictions, and body-shaming, the reality show continues to court controversy week after week.
In the latest episode of Bigg Boss 19, what began as a casual conversation between Tanya Mittal and Kunickaa Sadanand soon turned into a tense exchange. During their chat, Tanya confidently claimed she has “no ego,” a statement that immediately drew a counterpoint from Kunickaa. According to Kunickaa, ego is an inseparable part of the entertainment industry and, at times, even essential for survival. Tanya, however, stood her ground, saying she doesn’t mind being “choti” (humble or small) when required.
This moment once again spotlighted Tanya’s tall claims throughout the season. From calling herself the “most balanced” contestant to insisting she avoids unnecessary conflicts, Tanya has often portrayed herself as calm and grounded. Yet, her repeated confrontations with Amaal Mallik, Shehbaz Badesha, and Gaurav Khanna have raised questions about whether her words align with her actions. Many contestants and viewers feel Tanya’s definition of “no ego” changes depending on the situation.
Over recent weeks, Bigg Boss 19 itself has been under the scanner for several controversies. Viewers have accused the makers of bias, claiming that certain contestants, particularly Amaal Mallik, receive preferential treatment despite repeated clashes and rude behavior. The eviction of popular players Baseer Ali and Abhishek Bajaj was also termed “unfair” by fans, who felt both were shown the exit too soon despite strong performances. The issue of body-shaming, especially after Farrhana Bhatt’s remarks against Shehbaz Badesha, has further stirred outrage, with audiences demanding stricter action from the makers.
As debates around favouritism and fairness continue to dominate social media, Tanya and Kunickaa’s latest exchange adds another layer to the drama inside the Bigg Boss house, one that reflects not just personal egos but the growing divide between perception, power, and the politics of survival.
